mirror of
https://github.com/luau-lang/luau.git
synced 2024-11-15 14:25:44 +08:00
RFC: Deprecate table.getn/foreach/foreachi (#715)
[Rendered](https://github.com/Roblox/luau/blob/zeux-rfc-deptable/rfcs/deprecate-table-getn-foreach.md)
This commit is contained in:
parent
742702a17d
commit
8f37fc6dfc
31
rfcs/deprecate-table-getn-foreach.md
Normal file
31
rfcs/deprecate-table-getn-foreach.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
# Deprecate table.getn/foreach/foreachi
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Mark table.getn/foreach/foreachi as deprecated
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
`table.getn` was deprecated in Lua 5.1 that Luau is based on.
|
||||
|
||||
`table.getn(x)` is equivalent to `rawlen(x)` when `x` is a table; when `x` is not a table, `table.getn` produces an error. It's difficult to imagine code where `table.getn(x)` is better than either `#x` (idiomatic) or `rawlen(x)` (fully compatible replacement). However, `table.getn` is slower and provides yet another way to perform an operation, leading new users of the language to use it unknowingly.
|
||||
|
||||
`table.foreach` and `table.foreachi` were deprecated in Lua 5.2.
|
||||
|
||||
`table.foreach` is equivalent to a `for .. pairs` loop; `table.foreachi` is equivalent to a `for .. ipairs` loop; both may also be replaced by generalized iteration. Both functions are significantly slower than equivalent `for` loop replacements, are more restrictive because the function can't yield, and result in new users (particularly coming from JS background) unknowingly using these thus producing non-idiomatic non-performant code.
|
||||
|
||||
In both cases, the functions bring no value over other library or language alternatives, and thus just serve as a distraction.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design
|
||||
|
||||
We will mark all three functions as deprecated. The only consequence of this change is that the linter will start emitting warnings when they are used.
|
||||
|
||||
Removing support for these functions doesn't provide any measurable value and as such is not planned in the foreseeable future because it may cause backwards compatibility issues.
|
||||
|
||||
## Drawbacks
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
If we consider table.getn/etc as supported, we'd want to start optimizing their usage which gets particularly tricky with foreach and requires more compiler machinery than this is probably worth.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user