2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// This file is part of the Luau programming language and is licensed under MIT License; see LICENSE.txt for details
|
|
|
|
#include "Luau/TypeInfer.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "Fixture.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "doctest.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace Luau;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-10 02:07:25 +08:00
|
|
|
LUAU_FASTFLAG(LuauTypeMismatchInvarianceInError)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_SUITE_BEGIN("ProvisionalTests");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 10:42:00 +08:00
|
|
|
// These tests check for behavior that differs from the final behavior we'd
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// like to have. They serve to document the current state of the typechecker.
|
|
|
|
// When making future improvements, its very likely these tests will break and
|
|
|
|
// will need to be replaced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This test falls into a sort of "do as I say" pit of consequences:
|
|
|
|
* Technically, the type of the type() function is <T>(T) -> string
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* We thus infer that the argument to f is a free type.
|
|
|
|
* While we can still learn something about this argument, we can't seem to infer a union for it.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Is this good? Maybe not, but I'm not sure what else we should do.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "typeguard_inference_incomplete")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const std::string code = R"(
|
|
|
|
function f(a)
|
|
|
|
if type(a) == "boolean" then
|
|
|
|
local a1 = a
|
|
|
|
elseif a.fn() then
|
|
|
|
local a2 = a
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 10:42:00 +08:00
|
|
|
const std::string expected = R"(
|
|
|
|
function f(a:{fn:()->(a,b...)}): ()
|
|
|
|
if type(a) == 'boolean'then
|
|
|
|
local a1:boolean=a
|
|
|
|
elseif a.fn()then
|
|
|
|
local a2:{fn:()->(a,b...)}=a
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-05 00:19:20 +08:00
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(expected, decorateWithTypes(code));
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-14 03:16:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "xpcall_returns_what_f_returns")
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const std::string code = R"(
|
|
|
|
local a, b, c = xpcall(function() return 1, "foo" end, function() return "foo", 1 end)
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const std::string expected = R"(
|
|
|
|
local a:boolean,b:number,c:string=xpcall(function(): (number,string)return 1,'foo'end,function(): (string,number)return'foo',1 end)
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 07:00:14 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(code);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK("boolean" == toString(requireType("a")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK("number" == toString(requireType("b")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK("string" == toString(requireType("c")));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK(expected == decorateWithTypes(code));
|
2022-09-16 06:13:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We had a bug where if you have two type packs that looks like:
|
|
|
|
// { x, y }, ...
|
|
|
|
// { x }, ...
|
|
|
|
// It would infinitely grow the type pack because one WeirdIter is trying to catch up, but can't.
|
|
|
|
// However, the following snippet is supposed to generate an OccursCheckFailed, but it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "weirditer_should_not_loop_forever")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// this flag is intentionally here doing nothing to demonstrate that we exit early via case detection
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastInt sfis{"LuauTypeInferTypePackLoopLimit", 50};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function toVertexList(vertices, x, y, ...)
|
|
|
|
if not (x and y) then return vertices end -- no more arguments
|
|
|
|
vertices[#vertices + 1] = {x = x, y = y} -- set vertex
|
|
|
|
return toVertexList(vertices, ...) -- recurse
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This should also generate an OccursCheckFailed error too, like the above toVertexList snippet.
|
|
|
|
// at least up until we can get Luau to recognize this code as a valid function that iterates over a list of values in the pack.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "it_should_be_agnostic_of_actual_size")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f(x, y, ...)
|
|
|
|
if not y then return x end
|
|
|
|
return f(x, ...)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f(3, 2, 1, 0)
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ideally setmetatable's second argument would be an optional free table.
|
|
|
|
// For now, infer it as just a free table.
|
2022-05-14 03:16:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "setmetatable_constrains_free_type_into_free_table")
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local a = {}
|
|
|
|
local b
|
|
|
|
setmetatable(a, b)
|
|
|
|
b = 1
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeMismatch* tm = get<TypeMismatch>(result.errors[0]);
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(tm);
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("{- -}", toString(tm->wantedType));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("number", toString(tm->givenType));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Luau currently doesn't yet know how to allow assignments when the binding was refined.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "while_body_are_also_refined")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
type Node<T> = { value: T, child: Node<T>? }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local function visitor<T>(node: Node<T>, f: (T) -> ())
|
|
|
|
local current = node
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while current do
|
|
|
|
f(current.value)
|
|
|
|
current = current.child -- TODO: Can't work just yet. It thinks 'current' can never be nil. :(
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("Type 'Node<T>?' could not be converted into 'Node<T>'", toString(result.errors[0]));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Originally from TypeInfer.test.cpp.
|
|
|
|
// I dont think type checking the metamethod at every site of == is the correct thing to do.
|
|
|
|
// We should be type checking the metamethod at the call site of setmetatable.
|
2022-05-14 03:16:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "error_on_eq_metamethod_returning_a_type_other_than_boolean")
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local tab = {a = 1}
|
|
|
|
setmetatable(tab, {__eq = function(a, b): number
|
|
|
|
return 1
|
|
|
|
end})
|
|
|
|
local tab2 = tab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local a = tab2 == tab
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GenericError* ge = get<GenericError>(result.errors[0]);
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(ge);
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("Metamethod '__eq' must return type 'boolean'", ge->message);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Belongs in TypeInfer.refinements.test.cpp.
|
2022-12-02 18:46:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// We need refine both operands as `never` in the `==` branch.
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "lvalue_equals_another_lvalue_with_no_overlap")
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-12-02 18:46:05 +08:00
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff{"LuauIntersectionTestForEquality", true};
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f(a: string, b: boolean?)
|
|
|
|
if a == b then
|
|
|
|
local foo, bar = a, b
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
local foo, bar = a, b
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-02 18:46:05 +08:00
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(toString(requireTypeAtPosition({3, 33})), "string"); // a == b
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(toString(requireTypeAtPosition({3, 36})), "boolean?"); // a == b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(toString(requireTypeAtPosition({5, 33})), "string"); // a ~= b
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(toString(requireTypeAtPosition({5, 36})), "boolean?"); // a ~= b
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-28 05:29:34 +08:00
|
|
|
// Also belongs in TypeInfer.refinements.test.cpp.
|
|
|
|
// Just needs to fully support equality refinement. Which is annoying without type states.
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "discriminate_from_x_not_equal_to_nil")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
type T = {x: string, y: number} | {x: nil, y: nil}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local function f(t: T)
|
|
|
|
if t.x ~= nil then
|
|
|
|
local foo = t
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
local bar = t
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("{| x: string, y: number |}", toString(requireTypeAtPosition({5, 28})));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Should be {| x: nil, y: nil |}
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("{| x: nil, y: nil |} | {| x: string, y: number |}", toString(requireTypeAtPosition({7, 28})));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 09:05:31 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "bail_early_if_unification_is_too_complicated" * doctest::timeout(0.5))
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-11-05 10:42:00 +08:00
|
|
|
ScopedFastInt sffi{"LuauTarjanChildLimit", 1};
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastInt sffi2{"LuauTypeInferIterationLimit", 1};
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"LUA(
|
|
|
|
local Result
|
|
|
|
Result = setmetatable({}, {})
|
|
|
|
Result.__index = Result
|
|
|
|
function Result.new(okValue)
|
|
|
|
local self = setmetatable({}, Result)
|
|
|
|
self:constructor(okValue)
|
|
|
|
return self
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
function Result:constructor(okValue)
|
|
|
|
self.okValue = okValue
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
function Result:ok(val) return Result.new(val) end
|
|
|
|
function Result:a(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) return Result.new((self.okValue)) or p0 or p1 or p2 or p3 or p4 end
|
|
|
|
function Result:b(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) return Result:ok((self.okValue)) or p0 or p1 or p2 or p3 or p4 end
|
|
|
|
function Result:c(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) return Result:ok((self.okValue)) or p0 or p1 or p2 or p3 or p4 end
|
|
|
|
function Result:transpose(a)
|
|
|
|
return a and self.okValue:z(function(some)
|
|
|
|
return Result:ok(some)
|
|
|
|
end) or Result:ok(self.okValue)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)LUA");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto it = std::find_if(result.errors.begin(), result.errors.end(), [](TypeError& a) {
|
|
|
|
return nullptr != get<UnificationTooComplex>(a);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (it == result.errors.end())
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
dumpErrors(result);
|
|
|
|
FAIL("Expected a UnificationTooComplex error");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: Move this test to another source file when removing FFlag::LuauLowerBoundsCalculation
|
2022-02-12 02:43:14 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "do_not_ice_when_trying_to_pick_first_of_generic_type_pack")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff[]{
|
|
|
|
{"LuauReturnAnyInsteadOfICE", true},
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In-place quantification causes these types to have the wrong types but only because of nasty interaction with prototyping.
|
|
|
|
// The type of f is initially () -> free1...
|
|
|
|
// Then the prototype iterator advances, and checks the function expression assigned to g, which has the type () -> free2...
|
|
|
|
// In the body it calls f and returns what f() returns. This binds free2... with free1..., causing f and g to have same types.
|
|
|
|
// We then quantify g, leaving it with the final type <a...>() -> a...
|
|
|
|
// Because free1... and free2... were bound, in combination with in-place quantification, f's return type was also turned into a...
|
|
|
|
// Then the check iterator catches up, and checks the body of f, and attempts to quantify it too.
|
|
|
|
// Alas, one of the requirements for quantification is that a type must contain free types. () -> a... has no free types.
|
|
|
|
// Thus the quantification for f was no-op, which explains why f does not have any type parameters.
|
|
|
|
// Calling f() will attempt to instantiate the function type, which turns generics in type binders into to free types.
|
|
|
|
// However, instantiations only converts generics contained within the type binders of a function, so instantiation was also no-op.
|
|
|
|
// Which means that calling f() simply returned a... rather than an instantiation of it. And since the call site was not in tail position,
|
|
|
|
// picking first element in a... triggers an ICE because calls returning generic packs are unexpected.
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f() end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local g = function() return f() end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local x = (f()) -- should error: no return values to assign from the call to f
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
// f and g should have the type () -> ()
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("() -> (a...)", toString(requireType("f")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("<a...>() -> (a...)", toString(requireType("g")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("any", toString(requireType("x"))); // any is returned instead of ICE for now
|
2022-02-12 02:43:14 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "specialization_binds_with_prototypes_too_early")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function id(x) return x end
|
|
|
|
local n2n: (number) -> number = id
|
|
|
|
local s2s: (string) -> string = id
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERRORS(result); // Should not have any errors.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-22 04:36:41 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "weird_fail_to_unify_type_pack")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff[] = {
|
2022-09-09 05:44:50 +08:00
|
|
|
// I'm not sure why this is broken without DCR, but it seems to be fixed
|
|
|
|
// when DCR is enabled.
|
|
|
|
{"DebugLuauDeferredConstraintResolution", false},
|
2022-07-22 04:36:41 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f() return end
|
|
|
|
local g = function() return f() end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERRORS(result); // Should not have any errors.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-12 02:43:14 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "weird_fail_to_unify_variadic_pack")
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff[] = {
|
2022-09-09 05:44:50 +08:00
|
|
|
// I'm not sure why this is broken without DCR, but it seems to be fixed
|
|
|
|
// when DCR is enabled.
|
|
|
|
{"DebugLuauDeferredConstraintResolution", false},
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-12 02:43:14 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
--!strict
|
|
|
|
local function f(...) return ... end
|
|
|
|
local g = function(...) return f(...) end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERRORS(result); // Should not have any errors.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// Belongs in TypeInfer.builtins.test.cpp.
|
2022-05-27 04:33:48 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "pcall_returns_at_least_two_value_but_function_returns_nothing")
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-09-30 06:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff{"LuauBetterMessagingOnCountMismatch", true};
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f(): () end
|
|
|
|
local ok, res = pcall(f)
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-27 04:33:48 +08:00
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
2022-09-30 06:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("Function only returns 1 value, but 2 are required here", toString(result.errors[0]));
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
// CHECK_EQ("boolean", toString(requireType("ok")));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK_EQ("any", toString(requireType("res")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Belongs in TypeInfer.builtins.test.cpp.
|
2022-05-14 03:16:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "choose_the_right_overload_for_pcall")
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f(): number
|
|
|
|
if math.random() > 0.5 then
|
|
|
|
return 5
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
error("something")
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local ok, res = pcall(f)
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("boolean", toString(requireType("ok")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("number", toString(requireType("res")));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK_EQ("any", toString(requireType("res")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Belongs in TypeInfer.builtins.test.cpp.
|
2022-05-14 03:16:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "function_returns_many_things_but_first_of_it_is_forgotten")
|
2022-04-15 05:57:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function f(): (number, string, boolean)
|
|
|
|
if math.random() > 0.5 then
|
|
|
|
return 5, "hello", true
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
error("something")
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local ok, res, s, b = pcall(f)
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("boolean", toString(requireType("ok")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("number", toString(requireType("res")));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK_EQ("any", toString(requireType("res")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("string", toString(requireType("s")));
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("boolean", toString(requireType("b")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-08 09:05:31 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "free_is_not_bound_to_any")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function foo(f: (any) -> (), x)
|
|
|
|
f(x)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("((any) -> (), any) -> ()", toString(requireType("foo")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-01 07:29:02 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "greedy_inference_with_shared_self_triggers_function_with_no_returns")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff{"DebugLuauSharedSelf", true};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local T = {}
|
|
|
|
T.__index = T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function T.new()
|
|
|
|
local self = setmetatable({}, T)
|
|
|
|
return self:ctor() or self
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function T:ctor()
|
|
|
|
-- oops, no return!
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
2022-07-08 09:05:31 +08:00
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("Not all codepaths in this function return 'self, a...'.", toString(result.errors[0]));
|
2022-07-01 07:29:02 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-24 02:32:10 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "dcr_can_partially_dispatch_a_constraint")
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff[] = {
|
|
|
|
{"DebugLuauDeferredConstraintResolution", true},
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function hasDivisors(value: number)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function prime_iter(state, index)
|
|
|
|
hasDivisors(index)
|
|
|
|
index += 1
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-11 06:04:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// Solving this requires recognizing that we can't dispatch a constraint
|
|
|
|
// like this without doing further work:
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// (*blocked*) -> () <: (number) -> (b...)
|
|
|
|
//
|
2022-11-11 06:04:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// We solve this by searching both types for BlockedTypeVars and block the
|
|
|
|
// constraint on any we find. It also gets the job done, but I'm worried
|
|
|
|
// about the efficiency of doing so many deep type traversals and it may
|
|
|
|
// make us more prone to getting stuck on constraint cycles.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If this doesn't pan out, a possible solution is to go further down the
|
|
|
|
// path of supporting partial constraint dispatch. The way it would work is
|
|
|
|
// that we'd dispatch the above constraint by binding b... to (), but we
|
|
|
|
// would append a new constraint number <: *blocked* to the constraint set
|
|
|
|
// to be solved later. This should be faster and theoretically less prone
|
|
|
|
// to cyclic constraint dependencies.
|
2022-09-24 02:32:10 +08:00
|
|
|
CHECK("<a>(a, number) -> ()" == toString(requireType("prime_iter")));
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "free_options_cannot_be_unified_together")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TypeArena arena;
|
2022-09-09 05:44:50 +08:00
|
|
|
TypeId nilType = singletonTypes->nilType;
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-09 05:44:50 +08:00
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr scope = std::make_unique<Scope>(singletonTypes->anyTypePack);
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeId free1 = arena.addType(FreeTypePack{scope.get()});
|
|
|
|
TypeId option1 = arena.addType(UnionTypeVar{{nilType, free1}});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeId free2 = arena.addType(FreeTypePack{scope.get()});
|
|
|
|
TypeId option2 = arena.addType(UnionTypeVar{{nilType, free2}});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InternalErrorReporter iceHandler;
|
|
|
|
UnifierSharedState sharedState{&iceHandler};
|
2022-10-07 07:55:58 +08:00
|
|
|
Normalizer normalizer{&arena, singletonTypes, NotNull{&sharedState}};
|
|
|
|
Unifier u{NotNull{&normalizer}, Mode::Strict, NotNull{scope.get()}, Location{}, Variance::Covariant};
|
2022-08-26 04:55:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u.tryUnify(option1, option2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK(u.errors.empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u.log.commit();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToStringOptions opts;
|
|
|
|
CHECK("a?" == toString(option1, opts));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK("a?" == toString(option2, opts)); // This should hold, but does not.
|
|
|
|
CHECK("b?" == toString(option2, opts)); // This should not hold.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-02 07:00:14 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "for_in_loop_with_zero_iterators")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ScopedFastFlag sff{"DebugLuauDeferredConstraintResolution", false};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
function no_iter() end
|
|
|
|
for key in no_iter() do end -- This should not be ok
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-07 07:55:58 +08:00
|
|
|
// Ideally, we would not try to export a function type with generic types from incorrect scope
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "generic_type_leak_to_module_interface")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
fileResolver.source["game/A"] = R"(
|
|
|
|
local wrapStrictTable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local metatable = {
|
|
|
|
__index = function(self, key)
|
|
|
|
local value = self.__tbl[key]
|
|
|
|
if type(value) == "table" then
|
|
|
|
-- unification of the free 'wrapStrictTable' with this function type causes generics of this function to leak out of scope
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable(value, self.__name .. "." .. key)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
return value
|
|
|
|
end,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontend.check("game/A");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fileResolver.source["game/B"] = R"(
|
|
|
|
local wrapStrictTable = require(game.A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local Constants = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable(Constants, "Constants")
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontend.check("game/B");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ModulePtr m = frontend.moduleResolver.modules["game/B"];
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(m);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<TypeId> result = first(m->getModuleScope()->returnType);
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(result);
|
|
|
|
CHECK(get<AnyTypeVar>(*result));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "generic_type_leak_to_module_interface_variadic")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
fileResolver.source["game/A"] = R"(
|
|
|
|
local wrapStrictTable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local metatable = {
|
|
|
|
__index = function<T>(self, key, ...: T)
|
|
|
|
local value = self.__tbl[key]
|
|
|
|
if type(value) == "table" then
|
|
|
|
-- unification of the free 'wrapStrictTable' with this function type causes generics of this function to leak out of scope
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable(value, self.__name .. "." .. key)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
return ...
|
|
|
|
end,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontend.check("game/A");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fileResolver.source["game/B"] = R"(
|
|
|
|
local wrapStrictTable = require(game.A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local Constants = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return wrapStrictTable(Constants, "Constants")
|
|
|
|
)";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frontend.check("game/B");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ModulePtr m = frontend.moduleResolver.modules["game/B"];
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(m);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<TypeId> result = first(m->getModuleScope()->returnType);
|
|
|
|
REQUIRE(result);
|
|
|
|
CHECK(get<AnyTypeVar>(*result));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
// We need a simplification step to make this do the right thing. ("normalization-lite")
|
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(BuiltinsFixture, "table_insert_with_a_singleton_argument")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local function foo(t, x)
|
|
|
|
if x == "hi" or x == "bye" then
|
|
|
|
table.insert(t, x)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return t
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local t = foo({}, "hi")
|
|
|
|
table.insert(t, "totally_unrelated_type" :: "totally_unrelated_type")
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_NO_ERRORS(result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'd really like for this to be {string}
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ("{string | string}", toString(requireType("t")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 06:22:49 +08:00
|
|
|
namespace
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct IsSubtypeFixture : Fixture
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
bool isSubtype(TypeId a, TypeId b)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return ::Luau::isSubtype(a, b, NotNull{getMainModule()->getModuleScope().get()}, singletonTypes, ice);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
2022-11-05 01:02:37 +08:00
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 06:22:49 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(IsSubtypeFixture, "intersection_of_functions_of_different_arities")
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
check(R"(
|
|
|
|
type A = (any) -> ()
|
|
|
|
type B = (any, any) -> ()
|
|
|
|
type T = A & B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local a: A
|
|
|
|
local b: B
|
|
|
|
local t: T
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[maybe_unused]] TypeId a = requireType("a");
|
|
|
|
[[maybe_unused]] TypeId b = requireType("b");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(a, b)); // !!
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(b, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK("((any) -> ()) & ((any, any) -> ())" == toString(requireType("t")));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 06:22:49 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(IsSubtypeFixture, "functions_with_mismatching_arity")
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local a: (number) -> ()
|
|
|
|
local b: () -> ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local c: () -> number
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeId a = requireType("a");
|
|
|
|
TypeId b = requireType("b");
|
|
|
|
TypeId c = requireType("c");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(b, a));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(c, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(a, b));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(c, b));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(a, c));
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(b, c));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 06:22:49 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(IsSubtypeFixture, "functions_with_mismatching_arity_but_optional_parameters")
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (T0..TN) <: (T0..TN, A?)
|
|
|
|
* (T0..TN) <: (T0..TN, any)
|
|
|
|
* (T0..TN, A?) </: (T0..TN) We don't technically need to spell this out, but it's quite important.
|
|
|
|
* T <: T
|
|
|
|
* if A <: B and B <: C then A <: C
|
|
|
|
* T -> R <: U -> S if U <: T and R <: S
|
|
|
|
* A | B <: T if A <: T and B <: T
|
|
|
|
* T <: A | B if T <: A or T <: B
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local a: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
local b: (number) -> ()
|
|
|
|
local c: (number, number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeId a = requireType("a");
|
|
|
|
TypeId b = requireType("b");
|
|
|
|
TypeId c = requireType("c");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number) -> () </: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number? </: number (because number <: number, but nil </: number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(b, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number, number?) </: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number? </: number (as above)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(c, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number?) -> () <: (number) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number <: number? (because number <: number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(isSubtype(a, b));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number, number?) -> () <: (number) -> (number)
|
|
|
|
* The packs have inequal lengths, but (number) <: (number, number?)
|
|
|
|
* and number <: number
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(c, b));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number?) -> () </: (number, number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because (number, number?) </: (number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(a, c));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number) -> () </: (number, number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because (number, number?) </: (number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(b, c));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 06:22:49 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(IsSubtypeFixture, "functions_with_mismatching_arity_but_any_is_an_optional_param")
|
2022-10-14 06:59:53 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local a: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
local b: (number) -> ()
|
|
|
|
local c: (number, any) -> ()
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TypeId a = requireType("a");
|
|
|
|
TypeId b = requireType("b");
|
|
|
|
TypeId c = requireType("c");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number) -> () </: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number? </: number (because number <: number, but nil </: number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(b, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number, any) </: (number?) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number? </: number (as above)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(!isSubtype(c, a));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number?) -> () <: (number) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* because number <: number? (because number <: number)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
CHECK(isSubtype(a, b));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number, any) -> () </: (number) -> (number)
|
|
|
|
* The packs have inequal lengths
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(c, b));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number?) -> () </: (number, any) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* The packs have inequal lengths
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(a, c));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* (number) -> () </: (number, any) -> ()
|
|
|
|
* The packs have inequal lengths
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
// CHECK(!isSubtype(b, c));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-10 02:07:25 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_CASE_FIXTURE(Fixture, "assign_table_with_refined_property_with_a_similar_type_is_illegal")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CheckResult result = check(R"(
|
|
|
|
local t: {x: number?} = {x = nil}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if t.x then
|
|
|
|
local u: {x: number} = t
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LUAU_REQUIRE_ERROR_COUNT(1, result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (FFlag::LuauTypeMismatchInvarianceInError)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(R"(Type '{| x: number? |}' could not be converted into '{| x: number |}'
|
|
|
|
caused by:
|
|
|
|
Property 'x' is not compatible. Type 'number?' could not be converted into 'number' in an invariant context)",
|
|
|
|
toString(result.errors[0]));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
CHECK_EQ(R"(Type '{| x: number? |}' could not be converted into '{| x: number |}'
|
|
|
|
caused by:
|
|
|
|
Property 'x' is not compatible. Type 'number?' could not be converted into 'number')",
|
|
|
|
toString(result.errors[0]));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-30 04:25:12 +08:00
|
|
|
TEST_SUITE_END();
|